Categories
Academic writing Plagiarism Term papers

Plagiarism—Using Sources Ethically

Al Capone mugshot, Miami, FloridaI have found that many students are confused and helpless when it comes to understanding why a professor, including myself, has accused them of plagiarism. It seems to be a common practice for student writers to find an online article and then copy and paste a sentence into their paper. They often put a sentence from one article in the same paragraph as another one. Sometimes the original articles are cited, but more often not. When we sit down in my office to talk about it, they tell me this was how they wrote all their papers in high school. Some students from outside the US have told both Harvey and me this is how they were taught to write papers.

But let me make it clear. In the US, at university and professional levels, scholarly writers are expected to generate their own words and not copy any strings of words from sources. If you do lift a sentence or phrase, it must be in quotation marks, with the source properly cited, with page numbers. There is only one reason to use a sentence verbatim from a source: The author of that work says something really important to your argument and there simply is no better way to say it.

If you do use ideas from a source, you must cite the ideas you use, not just direct quotes. Basically you must cite any time the question arises in the reader’s mind: How do you know that?

Merely assembling sentences from online websites and PDFs of articles and books is not writing. It seems like some kind of word salad. The writing you produce comes from your own thoughts and opinions, not a goulash of other people’s ideas.

P.S. Most professors at American colleges and universities have access to software that checks student assignments against what’s on the Internet and elsewhere, so the chances of getting caught for plagiarism are much greater than ever.

Categories
Footnotes and endnotes Term papers

Term Paper Tricks: Using Footnotes to Make Your Paper Look More Academic Without Really Trying

A country dance scene from Thomas Vinterberg's 2015 movie version of Far From the Madding Crowd.
A country dance scene from Thomas Vinterberg’s 2015 movie version of Far From the Madding Crowd.

Most students seem to prefer to use MLA, APA or Harvard citation styles, thus avoiding using footnotes or endnotes. However, no matter what citation style you choose, the judicious use of footnotes or endnotes can make even the simplest term paper look more academic and might even impress your professor with your scholarly skills. I’m not talking about footnotes used to cite a source, but rather to embellish your paper with additional information.

For instance, say you’re writing a term paper on Thomas Hardy’s novel, Far from the Madding Crowd. Your aim was to focus on its love story. In the process, you realize he was an English country dance aficionado, including them in many of his stories and was even involved with the English Folk Dance Society. Being something of a dance aficionado yourself, you really want to include some reference to this in your paper, though you don’t want to take your eyes off of your paper’s main thrust.

You try to include one or two paragraphs about the topic in your paper, but no matter how you phrase it, it seems to interrupt your narrative flow. In other words, it seems out of place. Short of changing the topic of your paper to something like “English Country Dance in the Novels of Thomas Hardy”—which you don’t really have time to do—you have three choices: (1) Leave the paragraphs in, (2) take them out, or (3) remove them from the body of the paper and put them in a footnote instead.

Option one might be risky, as it might hurt your grade, since your paper seems to be going off topic. The second approach avoids this problem, but it might be frustrating. The third option, I would argue, might be the best solution. You get to include information you’re really passionate about without interrupting your narrative flow; it also makes you seem scholarly without really trying—just check the endnotes found in the back of practically any university press found in your school library, if you don’t believe me.

P.S. I find many students don’t realize their word processing program contains commands to create and insert footnotes and endnotes. I’ve seen graduates of prestigious Ivy League colleges do footnotes by hand, inserting superscript numbers and trying to guess how much space to allot at the bottom of the page to put the footnote in. That’s a lot of unnecessary work. Give yourself a break, learn the command and save yourself time and aggravation.

Categories
Academic writing Encylopedias Research tools Term papers

Research Tools: Using Wikipedia or Not?

Philip Roth
Novelist Philip Roth who had a problem with his Wikipedia entry.

When I used to list the dos and don’ts for my students writing term papers, I warned them

not to cite Wikipedia as a source. At the same time, I also said it wasn’t a bad idea to consult Wikipedia

in writing your paper. While this may seem contradictory and perhaps hypocritical, I assure you it is not.

The most basic reason for not citing a Wikipedia article is that your professor will almost automatically disallow it and your grade can suffer. The articles also fail to meet one of the most traditional criteria for evaluating a published source.

As I noted in yesterday’s post, Wikipedia articles might be seen as term papers rather than original scholarly research. In fact, the guidelines for contributors specifically state:

“Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas, as well as any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position. This means that Wikipedia is not the place to publish your own opinions, experiences, arguments, or conclusions.”

Given these rules, it is understandable that their entries tend to repeat the standard narrative on any topic.

More important, almost anybody can write or rewrite an article, and the author’s identity is by policy anonymous. So there is no way to tell whether it was written by high school dropout or by a specialist with a PhD. How then, professors will point out, can you evaluate the validity of an article if you are unable to check out the author’s credentials?

But if you’re unfamiliar with a topic, a good Wikipedia article can provide a useful summary of information about it; in addition, its citations, lists of further reading and external links can also give you a quick overview of the literature in the field—which is one the values of a good encyclopedia.

However, Wikipedia articles can at times be wildly inaccurate and misleading, especially in regards to lesser known topics. Scholars who come across one of these erroneous entries may not be inclined to complain or take the time to rewrite it. (Why bother rewriting something only to have some person or persons unknown promptly change it?)

The seeming absurdity of some of Wikipedia’s policies was revealed in 2012, when Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist Philip Roth tried to correct a “misstatement” about the inspiration for his novel, The Human Stain. However, his request was rejected because Roth was not considered a credible source of information about himself. However, they did note the corrections when Roth published an open letter to Wikipedia in The New Yorker, since, under their rules, it was a more credible source! For a more nuanced history of this episode, I recommend two pieces published in The Guardian here and here.

— Harvey Deneroff